banner

Knowledge

Home

Knowledge

PL vs EL imaging analysis

PL vs EL imaging analysis
Nov 09, 2023

Luminescence imaging

The basic principle of luminescence imaging is to excite the surface of a sample to make it glow, and then capture the luminescent imaging with a camera.

Two imaging methods commonly used in crystalline silicon cells

PL, Photo-luminescence, is excited by incident photons. The light source illuminates the entire sample uniformly, so the resulting imaging is a true luminescence profile of the sample, unaffected by non-uniform excitation or local cross-resistance. The local luminescence intensity of imaging is determined by the carrier density and lifetime of the region. The stronger the glow in an area, the higher the pixel value. Conversely, the weaker the emitted area, the lower the pixel value. There are several factors that can make the glow diminished:

Low carrier lifetime

The doping density of the carriers is low

Local defects (formation of carrier recombination centers and reduction of local carrier lifetimes). Local defects include: elemental impurities, physical defects of silicon crystals (e.g., cracks, dislocations), grain boundaries of polysilicon, etc.

EL, electroluminescence, is excited by an electric current. During the generation of EL imaging, an excitation current is injected into the main grid of the cell. The series resistance of the solar cell itself causes the excitation voltage to gradually decrease, so that the excitation degree outside the busbar is gradually weakened. Therefore, the imaging will also reflect the phenomenon of uneven excitation on the basis of the real luminescence distribution map. In addition, the local series resistance distribution also changes the degree of reduction of the excitation voltage, which further weakens the luminescence.

PL vs EL analysis comparison

 

The EL image contains the effect of series resistance + the effect of local defects (compound loss)

PL images do not show the effect of series resistance, and are mainly affected by local defects (compound loss)

PL imaging was normal, and the EL imaging area was dark, indicating that resistance loss was the main loss factor

The PL imaging was dark and the EL imaging was also dark, indicating that the defect (compound loss) was the main cause

The luminous intensity is further analyzed

 

The production of surplus and low births → the compound of low births

SRH composite, poor luminous intensity

Auger recombination with poor luminous intensity

Radiant recombination with maximum luminous intensity (defect-free state)

 

PL vs EL imaging analysisPL vs EL imaging analysisPL imaging interpretation

PL imaging interpretation

The PL intensity is positively correlated with the proportion of spontaneous radiation excitation

 - Proportionality constant, injection level  is constant

PL can be tested in two modes: steady state (SS) and quasi steady state (QSS).

PL tests for low subon lifetime, which is not affected by the space charge region

It can output a map of the life of the few sons

It can be converted to iVoc

The higher the brightness→ more radiative recombination

 

A dim brightness → indicates less radiative recombination→ lower NP values→ fewer sons and lower lifetimes

PL vs EL imaging analysis

leave a message

leave a message
If you are interested in our products and want to know more details,please leave a message here,we will reply you as soon as we can.
submit

Home

products

whatsApp

contact